Years in
Business
The Expert: Dr. Reynold Rimoldi, an orthopedic surgeon and spinal specialist based in Nevada, testifying for the defense on whether plaintiff’s orthopedic problems stemmed from the sign or from other causes.
Testifying for the defense, Dr. Reynold Rimoldi, a Las Vegas orthopedist, gives his opinions regarding a injuries a plaintiff claims he suffered a resort’s large, arch-like sign struck him. Rimoldi concludes there is no objective evidence that the plaintiff’s problems were related to the trauma that occurred, but were instead chronic difficulties that involved multiple areas.
Based on an examination of the plaintiff and his record, Rimoldi reports at trial that the plaintiff showed signs of neck and back strain after the incident, but there was no evidence of trauma. Studies done at the time confirmed chronic degenerative changes of the spine, but the patient did not suffer from radiculopathy then [pain, numbness, or weakness in the part of the body which is supplied by a nerve root that has been injured or irritated], and did not complain of radiculopathy temporally related to the incident with the sign.
The doctor then explains various pain and diagnostic injections relevant to the plaintiff’s injury. He details epidural injections and how they can be used as a diagnostic tool while being administered therapeutically. The injection, he explains, contains an anesthetic as well as a steroid: the anesthetic gives immediate relief, confirming that there is pathology causing problems at the level of the injection, while the steroid provides longer term pain relief therapeutically as an anti-inflammatory.
Rimoldi notes that a facet injection is another type of intervention for people with back pain. It differs from an epidural in that it is not aimed at the nerve root leaving the spine. Instead, the anesthetic and steroid are injected directly into the bony joint behind the nerve root. A traumatically ruptured disc would irritate a nerve root. However, facet joint pain is not related to nerve root irritation. Instead, the pain originates from a degenerative condition of the bones making up the facet joint, such as arthritis. In this case, however, Rimoldi notes that neither epidural nor facet injections seemed to affect this patient’s subjective complaints of pain.
The expert concludes that this patient suffered from back and neck strains and bruising that should have resolved within 6-12 weeks with conservative treatment. However, because his symptoms did not resolve within that timeframe, he agrees with the treating physician’s MRI order. This test confirmed “no objective evidence of trauma,” only preexisting changes.
Because of that finding, Rimoldi tells jurors treatments related to the trauma should have been discontinued, and only treatments dealing with the patient’s chronic difficulties pre-dating the accident should have been performed. The injections he previously described provided no value in this regard.
With so many levels affected by chronic degenerative changes in the cervical, lumbar, and sacral areas, Rimoldi cautions against performing fusion surgery. He sees this as “art surgery”—the result of which is up to interpretation—as opposed to “science surgery” that has an easily definable positive result. The many areas of degenerative change in this patient’s spine would present any surgeon an impossible dilemma. Which of these areas is the cause of the patient’s pain? We cannot know, so operating on a patient like this is unlikely to alleviate his discomfort.
While the pre-trial settlement offer had been $2.5 million. Rimoldi’s testimony likely played a key role in the jury’s award of just over $524,000.
Gary Gansar, MD, is residency-trained in general surgery. He served as Chief of Surgery and Staff at Elmwood Medical Center and on the Medical Executive Committee at Touro Infirmary and Mercy Hospital in New Orleans, LA. Dr. Gansar was Board Certified in general surgery while in active practice. He joined AMFS in 2015 as a Physician Medical Director.
The medical expert witness partner for attorneys serious about building a winning case
AMFS is your trusted source for highly-qualified medical expert witnesses. After pioneering the field nearly three decades ago, we’re continuing to redefine medical expert witness services by providing value far beyond a referral alone.
Our Physician Medical Directors know what it takes to build a strong case. Our medical expert witnesses leave no doubt. And our case managers streamline billing and logistics every step of the way, letting you focus on what you do best: constructing your winning case. Explore why AMFS clients expect more from their medical expert witnesses—and get it.
